what is the answer to 0/0, 0^0, and sq. root of 0

?

0/0 and 0^0 are undefined, simple as that.
What is defined:?0 is 0, simple as that

? being square root. 0 is the only number that when multiplied by any other number equals itself. Therefore defaulting it to be it's on square root.

@0^0, fuller explanation

0^0 is still undefined, though, as x²/x² implies that x ? 0.

point taken, I was demostrating how 0^0 was dividing by 0

so 0^0=0/0

I'm pretty sure that 0/0 and 0^0 both equal negative infinity through positive infinity because 0/0=x and when u multiply each side by 0 you get 0=0x x can equal anything now...

yeah, owned,
To clarify:


I don't agree with the negative infinity part, however.

Makes sense, they also have the same limits for x?0

Just so you know, wrtlprnft, if you on a mac, Shift-Period and Shift-Comma can be less than and greater than signs, and option-comma and option-period are less/greater-than or equal to. <?>?

I'm using linux, but I've mapped my right alt key to do all sorts of useful stuff (besides the stuff in the German keyboard layout).
That's how I get things like ?, µ, ?, ?, ?, ð, ¹, ², ³, ¼, ½, ?, ?, ?, ?, ¬, ?, ?, ?, ·, ÷, ×, ?, ±, ?. And that's just the math related stuff

Øwned: multiplying/dividing by 0 is not an equivalent transformation, thus your reasoning can't work

I've got ?=???±÷???, none of the fractions =C

0/0 is only symbol to note some functions limeses like wrtl wrote (it's unofficial)

0:0 is unallowed - it's one of the main laws of math, take a look at this:

wrong

The first one is undefined, you need to specify the direction (+0 or -0). The seconf one is simply 1/k for k ? 0.

am i wrong?

For the first one:For the second one: You're right, I read 1/x